MARC보기
LDR00000cam u22002051a 4500
001000013901101
00520210310094142
006m o d
007cr cnu---unuuu
008160524s2016 dcua ob 001 0 eng d
020 ▼a 9781626162839 ▼q electronic bk.
020 ▼a 1626162832 ▼q electronic bk.
035 ▼a (OCoLC)950459330 ▼z (OCoLC)950460164
037 ▼a 22573/ctt1c3pqg1 ▼b JSTOR
040 ▼a JSTOR ▼b eng ▼c JSTOR ▼d YDXCP ▼d IDEBK ▼d 224010 ▼d P@U ▼d CDX ▼d EBLCP ▼d N$T ▼e pn ▼e rda
043 ▼a n-us--- ▼a d------
050 4 ▼a UA23 ▼b .P495 2016eb
072 7 ▼a POL012000 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a HIS027110 ▼2 bisacsh
072 7 ▼a POL011010 ▼2 bisacsh
08204 ▼a 327.1170973 ▼2 22
090 ▼a 327.1170973
1001 ▼a Pfundstein Chamberlain, Dianne, ▼e author.
24510 ▼a Cheap threats: ▼h [electronic resource]: ▼b why the United States struggles to coerce weak states / ▼c Dianne Pfundstein Chamberlain.
260 1 ▼a Washington, D.C.: ▼b Georgetown University Press, ▼c [2016].
300 ▼a 1 online resource (xii, 270 pages) : ▼b illustrations.
504 ▼a Includes bibliographical references (pages 241-260) and index.
5050 ▼a Introduction : too cheap to compel -- The logic of costly compellence -- U.S. compellent threats 1945-2007 -- The 1962 Cuban missile crisis -- The 2011 Libya crisis -- The 1991 threat against Iraq -- The 2003 threat against Iraq -- Conclusion : the implications of costly compellence for theory and policy -- Appendix. Description of how the dataset was constructed.
520 ▼a The United States has a huge advantage in military power over other states, yet it is frequently unable to coerce weak adversary states with threats alone. Instead, over the past two decades, the leaders of Iraq, Haiti, Serbia, Afghanistan, and Libya have dismissed US threats and invited military clashes. Why have weak states risked and ultimately suffered catastrophic defeat when giving in to US demands earlier might have allowed their survival? Why was it necessary to use force at all? Pfundstein finds that the United States' compellent threats often fail because the use of force has become relatively cheap for the United States in terms of political costs, material costs, and casualties. This comparatively low-cost model of war that relies on deficit spending, air power, high technology, and a light footprint by an all-volunteer force has allowed the United States to casually threaten force and frequently carry out short-term military campaigns. Paradoxically, this frequent use of "cheap" force has made adversary states doubt that the United States is highly motivated to bear high costs over a sustained period if the intervention is not immediately successful.
650 0 ▼a Military art and science ▼x Decision making.
650 0 ▼a Strategy.
650 7 ▼a Military art and science ▼x Decision making. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01020890
650 7 ▼a Military policy. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01021386
650 7 ▼a Military relations. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01353799
650 7 ▼a Strategy. ▼2 fast ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01134406
650 7 ▼a POLITICAL SCIENCE / Security (National & International) ▼2 bisacsh
651 0 ▼a United States ▼x Military policy.
651 0 ▼a United States ▼x Military relations ▼z Developing countries.
651 0 ▼a Developing countries ▼x Military relations ▼z United States.
651 7 ▼a Developing countries. ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01242969 ▼2 fast
651 7 ▼a United States. ▼0 (OCoLC)fst01204155 ▼2 fast
655 4 ▼a Electronic books.
77608 ▼i Print version: ▼a Pfundstein Chamberlain, Dianne. ▼t Cheap threats. ▼d Washington, D.C. : Georgetown University Press, [2016] ▼z 9781626162822 ▼w (DLC) 2015025240 ▼w (OCoLC)919452104
85640 ▼u http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&scope=site&db=nlebk&AN=1240048
953 ▼a e-Book